![]() ![]() But here's my basic understand knowledge of the other two:Ĭaptivate: More features. I don't know much about lectora, so I will have to leave that one out. The skins on Captivate are also a bit clunky. ![]() The nice thing is, it doesn't limit users to just that - more advanced designers and/or programmers will find Lectora an easy way to integrate a lot of different pieces into one professional course that can be easily published for delivery via an LMS.Ĭaptivate can also publish to SCORM, but it's clunkier, less-user friendly, and more difficult to integrate other tools together (flash files, external HTML files, Edge files, etc). The interface has come a long way and is quite easy to create event he most complex actions without programming knowledge. I use Lectora as a home base ESPECIALLY when I'm using other tools like Flash or Edge. So I'd recommend use of both application actually (should you need interactive screen capture training.) However, that being said, I've also been known to then wrap that published content within a larger Lectora-based course. Captivate certainly is my go-to when I need to create any kind of software simulation training. I haven't used it in recent years so, like adobeJuan, I'll leave that insight to others.Īs far as the Captivate vs Lectora comparison, it's not entirely an apples to apples comparison. I used Articulate many years ago and am aware that its evolution has really improved its usability and is a top choice for many organizations. Regarding Responsive Design, I understand that Lectora is working on it and it's coming. To create basic online courses we use SNAP (also by Trivantis) which literally is a PowerPoint plugin, but for anything that needs to be truly interactive, Lectora has worked well for us. Over the last year and a half that I have been using it, I have been able to go much deeper in the product on my own, using variables to solve advanced challenges that would normally have required a talented coder. Lectora defies that pattern: After attending Lectora Training (recommended), I was able to get up and running immediately. I am used to applications like Photoshop or AfterEffects which have a steep learning curve for beginners. Regarding LECTORA, I found it pretty easy to learn (certainly not harder than Articulate), but there's a lot of depth and power under the hood. To be honest, I haven't worked with it enough to evaluate how deep the tool is so I'll leave that to others. I attended ARTICULATE Training, and it seems relatively straightforward. I agree with Rick that each tool has its own strengths.ĬAPTIVATE is good for creating software simulations, but most of the training I develop is not software simulations, so I don't use it much. ![]() ![]() Hi Bobby, I've worked with Captivate some, Storyline a little, and Lectora a LOT. We use it to wrapper Captivate many times and it gives us a lot of capabilities. In fact, we consider Lectora the best for integrating ANY content into it. If you do a lot of development it's good to have a strong toolbox that fits your needs well. I never recommend that any shop have simply one tool. Lectora, for simulations, is not the best as it's slow to develop a sim in it (though you could). Any time we've had to do more than a page turner, we tend to use Lectora as it's not buggy and just works. The Lectora UI now looks like PowerPoint as well in that it has a ribbon, but is better structured to take advantage of Lectora's power vs. The ability to navigate easily and create powerful courses with inheritance and flexibility makes it my number one choice. You can use Lectora for simple or for complex. Lectora is way easier than most people think and more powerful than the previous two in developing advanced learning. Triggers are OK but there aren't a ton of them and you can't really group triggers. But it does look almost exactly like PowerPoint which makes it easier for some to learn. It is the slowest as far as production processes go (heads down development). Storyline is fairly easy but also more limited. Learning curve isn't hard but it can be inconsistent and buggy at times. It has enough logic to get creative with soft-skills course development. I've worked extensively with all three of these and we've developed scores in each.Ĭaptivate is strongest for creating simulations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |